And
what about the cinema? As a 'impure' art, it has always turned its
gaze towards the great forefathers. Ancient tragedies have a ready-made
screenplay. The problem is not just representing and reminding one
of the tragic, but how to present a different viewpoint -what Godard
would call the ethics of the angle. The Atreids is a cursed generation
that always determines the dilemmas of justice and catharsis, Odysseus
is the eternal traveller of the conscience; Orpheus descends to Hades
to answer the determinative aporia of death; Antigone, Medea and
Electra confront power, maternity, justice, institutions and morality.
Cinema did not only borrow from ancient narrative; it confronted them,
and dynamically and creatively confuted their moral, existential and
psychoanalytical content. From Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle
Huillet to Theo Angelopoulos, from Jean Cocteau to Pier Paolo Pasolini,
from
Yiorgos Tzavellas and Michael Cacoyannis to Frieda Liappa and Nikos
Nikolaides, from Gregory Markopoulos, Jean-Luc Godard, Luchino Visconti,
and even Alfred Hitchcock to Miklos Jancsü, cinematographers seek in
the ancients the eternal angst, the confirmation of human tragedy in
all times and all places.
Cinema, however, is not just there to ponder on these philosophical
questions. It also entertains the masses, on a broader scale than any
other Art in history. At some point, for instance, cinema employed
Heracles to entertain the public, which clamours for and believes in
mythical victors as an outlet to its own defeats. Often sprinkling
films with a good measure of mythological spice from other irrelevant
traditions, the Italian Cinecitta studios charmingly tossed together
ancient Greek myths and their Roman successors, and from this mixture
emerged a two-dimensional Heracles, na•ve yet unconquerable- a thoroughly
entertaining body-builder.
[ previous... ] [ next... ]
|